Documents and texts
9 released templates. Each passed a check on test data; it is switched on in the panel by the director, and a person decides on every proposal. Example results are illustrative: the names and companies in them are made up.
Business letters
The problem it removes: A formal letter gets rewritten three times and still goes out with mistakes.
More detail
What it does: A formal letter to a partner or counterparty in Russian or Kazakh — based on the contract and obligations on record.
What a person decides: Signing and sending.
For whom: Manager.
How to measure: Letters sent without rewrites.
Example result: “Primer-Nedvizhimost LLP. Dear Yerlan Maratovich, under lease agreement SCH-LEASE-2026 dated September 1, 2026, we would like to remind you that notice of renewal is due 30 days before expiry, that is, by December 1. Please let us know your decision in writing. Sincerely, Aizhan Seitova, Director.”
Trilingual document translation
The problem it removes: Customers and partners need documents in three languages, and there’s no translator.
More detail
What it does: Translates a document into Russian, Kazakh, and English — keeping numbers, names, and terms intact.
What a person decides: Publishing and signing.
For whom: Employee.
How to measure: Time to translate a document.
Example result: “Translation of the booking rules. EN: You can cancel your booking no later than 24 hours in advance. RU: Отменить запись можно не позднее чем за 24 часа. KK: Жазылудан кемінде 24 сағат бұрын бас тартуға болады.”
Document summary
The problem it removes: Long documents take hours to read, and the key points get lost.
More detail
What it does: Boils a long document down to ten lines: what it’s about, what matters, deadlines, and what to do.
What a person decides: Decisions on the document.
For whom: Manager.
How to measure: Time spent reading documents.
Example result: “Situation: a letter from the building manager about facade repairs. Key point: from November 3 to 14, the office entrance is through the courtyard, and parking at the entrance is closed. Options: notify booked customers or post a notice. Recommendation: both. Today: send customers booked on those dates the new entrance location.”
What changed in the contract
The problem it removes: Clauses change in the new contract version before signing, and nobody notices until too late.
More detail
What it does: Compares two contract versions: which clauses changed and what risk that poses to the company.
What a person decides: Signing and redlines.
For whom: Manager.
How to measure: Contracts signed without unfavorable changes.
Example result: “Situation: 3 clauses changed in the new supply contract. Key point: clause 5.2 — payment terms cut from 30 to 10 days, and the late penalty raised from 0.1% to 0.5% a day. Options: 1) restore the original terms; 2) accept 10 days without the higher penalty. Recommendation: 1. Today: send the supplier a disagreement protocol on clause 5.2.”
Disagreement protocol
The problem it removes: Contracts get signed on the other side’s terms because no one knows how to propose their own.
More detail
What it does: Drafts a disagreement protocol for a contract: each clause in the counterparty’s wording and in ours.
What a person decides: Signing and sending.
For whom: Manager.
How to measure: Contracts signed on our terms.
Example result: “Disagreement protocol for supply contract No. 14. Clause 5.2 — supplier’s wording: ‘Payment within 10 days’; our wording: ‘Payment within 30 days of delivery.’ Clause 7.1 — supplier’s wording: ‘Penalty of 0.5% per day’; our wording: ‘Penalty of 0.1% per day, capped at 10% of the amount.’ For decision: signatory.”
Letters and certificates for customers
The problem it removes: Customers ask for letters and confirmations, and each one takes half an hour by hand.
More detail
What it does: Drafts a certificate, guarantee letter, or confirmation for a customer — based on the contract and obligations on record.
What a person decides: Signature and stamp.
For whom: Employee.
How to measure: Time per certificate.
Example result: “Certificate. Issued to Bereke Food LLP to confirm that its September payment obligations under packaging supply contract No. 31 dated September 2, 2026, have been fulfilled in full. Issued for presentation upon request. Director — signature, stamp.”
Counterparty check
The problem it removes: Companies start working with an unreliable counterparty without checking the registry extract.
More detail
What it does: A summary from the counterparty’s registry extract and public data: status, debts, lawsuits, and red flags.
What a person decides: Whether to work with the counterparty.
For whom: Manager.
How to measure: Deals with problem counterparties.
Spreadsheet cleanup
The problem it removes: A messy export breaks mailings and reports: duplicates, phone numbers in different formats.
More detail
What it does: Cleans an export: duplicates, phones and dates in one format, empty and broken rows — as a list of fixes.
What a person decides: Which fixes to apply.
For whom: Employee.
How to measure: Errors in the customer database.
Example result: “Situation: the export has 120 customers, 7 duplicates, and 15 phone numbers without a country code. Key point: Aigerim Saparova is duplicated — two rows with different phones, and it’s unclear which is right. Options: 1) keep both numbers on one record; 2) ask the customer. Recommendation: 1. Today: convert phones to the +7 700 000 00 00 format.”
Business cards into the CRM
The problem it removes: Trade show contacts sit in a stack of business cards and get lost.
More detail
What it does: Turns business card text and contact lists into CRM records: name, company, title, phone, email, what was agreed.
What a person decides: Creating the records.
For whom: Sales manager.
How to measure: Trade show contacts turned into records.
Basis: product documentation; the platform code. This page describes what exists in this build, not what is planned.